1 Vikus

Abolishment Of Death Penalty Essay Topics

Death penalty essays tend to examine the arguments in favor and against capital punishment, which is a subject for a long-lasting debate across the world. Pro death penalty essay usually provides well-grounded reasons for the approval of this procedure, while essay against death penalty presents capital punishment as an immoral and unjustified act. Against death penalty essay usually argues that capital punishment should not be legalized at all costs, because it violates the religious dogmas and also because it is unethical and unreasonable. The following death penalty essay will examine the arguments in favor and against capital punishment to end up with a reasonable and justified conclusion as for whether death penalty should be adopted across the world. The paper below represents a death penalty pros and cons essay, which neither approves nor disapproves capital punishment but rather gives readers a chance to decide for themselves. Death penalty argumentative essay presented below focuses on the issue of capital punishment specifically in the United States. Death penalty remains a questionable matter that provokes much debate among the ruling authorities of many countries around the world.

The following death penalty persuasive essay will provide a few serious arguments with an aim to persuade the public that the issue of capital punishment should be solved in the nearest future. The current argumentative essay on death penalty will emphasize that all countries should take responsibility for the consequences of death penalty legalization in a number of ways. Even though capital punishment has been abolished by more than a hundred countries across the world, it still remains a debatable issue. The current essay on death penalty is an attempt to clarify whether death penalty is a justifiable procedure or not. Capital punishment is regarded as the most serious punishment on the planet. The following essay about death penalty will start from examining the cons of capital punishment by providing arguments against this procedure. It needs to be noted that it is doubtful that the civilized society of modern days should take off people’s life even if a person has committed a serious crime. Let us discuss the arguments against death penalty.


  • Capital punishment is a direct violation of human rights that are given to people in order to lead a normal life. Human rights are considered one of the most important rights provided to individuals. The basic right of any person is a right to life, be it criminal or not. People should not violate the right to life irrespective of the crimes committed by this or that individual.
  • Death penalty is associated with ethical, social and racial biases. It is considered that such kind of punishment is biased in many respects. This is proved by the statistics according to which nearly 50% of individuals subjected to death penalty are African Americans. That is why capital punishment is considered to be based on racial stereotypes that should not be part of the legal process.
  • Wrongful subjection to capital punishment is another argument against this procedure. No one is perfect and so are the judges. It can often be observed that innocent people are wrongfully subjected to punishment. A lot of people become victims of such wrongful execution and this leads to the loss of trust and faith towards justice and legal authorities among the citizens. It goes without saying that life of a human being is precious and it should not be taken away without legal grounds. The errors in judicial system often lead to irrevocable consequences. Therefore, it can be assumed that capital punishment should not be made legal.
  • Another argument against death penalty is an assumption that people should be given a second chance under any circumstances. Humans are considered to be imperfect beings. Everyone should therefore be given a second chance to be able to correct their behavior and become better. Even if a person has committed a serious crime, he/she should be granted such a privilege. We are all human beings and the personality of an individual should not be judged according to his/her acts. They should be given a chance to improve themselves, because the primary purpose of justice is to remove crime from the society, but not to take away people’s life.


  • Among the arguments in favor of capital punishment is the fact that death penalty is perceived by some people as retribution for one’s deeds. Justice requires following the saying “Tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye”. It is the most serious argument in favor of death penalty. If a criminal commits an act resulting in personal gains, the system of justice should take care to remove this individual from the society. The person should therefore be punished as intensely as the crime he/she has committed. If the person dares to lay hands on the welfare of the society, he/she should be deprived of the privilege of being a part of the society in order to ensure comfort and wellbeing of all people.
  • Another argument is that by subjecting people to capital punishment, the justice system shows that all crimes will be strictly punished, and this makes criminals be afraid of the consequences of their deeds. This is similar to the fear of going to Hell after death. And this is exactly what is supposed to stop individuals from doing something unethical or immoral. The fear of losing one’s life makes people be cautious in their actions.
  • One more argument is that less damage will prevent greater harm. A criminal is similar to a rotten fruit among the good ones. Those who commit crimes are like stains on the face of the society. And they can infect other people with the similar disease. Therefore, they should be deprived of their lives in order to ensure that other people do not follow their example. All humans live in a civilized society, so that no one should be allowed to commit inhuman acts which might cause damage or discomfort to other individuals. That is why death penalty is considered the best way to get rid of the infectious individuals and remove them from the society. This should be done before these individuals have a chance to pass their unethical and immoral beliefs to other people.

Did you like the essay? You can order one on our website. Don’t miss a chance to get qualified help from a professional writing service.

Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Essay

1043 Words5 Pages

Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

Why should the death penalty be abolished? The death penalty should be abolished because of many reasons. Many people believe the saying, 'an eye for an eye'. But when will people realize that just because someone may have killed a loved one that the best thing for that person is to die also. People don't realize that they are putting the blood of another person life on their hands. This makes them just as guilty as the person who committed the crime: the only difference is that they didn't use weapon except their mouth to kill them. The death penalty should be abolished because it is racist, punishes the poor, condemns those who are innocent to death, and is a cruel punishment.…show more content…

A Georgia study found that killers of whites are 4.3 times more likely to receive a death sentence than killers of blacks. More than 75 percent of those on federal death row are non-white. Of the 156 federal death penalty prosecutions approved by the Attorney General since 1988, 74 percent of the defendants were non-white (governmentguide.com) . This shows that there is something definitely wrong with the judicial system. If this isn?t enough to convince you that the death penalty is wrong. Then people may need to look at other reasons.

The death penalty, does not only show unequal rights, but it also punishes the poor. It shows in recent studies that if an inmate can afford good legal representation, they might can get a lesser charge than death row. It also shows that ninety percent of defendants cannot afford to hire an experienced criminal defense lawyer. Since they cannot afford to hire one, they are forced to use inexperienced court-appointed attorneys that are being underpaid for their services. The less the court-appointed attorneys make, the less they want to make their defense so that they can get rid of this case, and start back making their usual amount of money.

There has been many inmates sentenced to death row that innocent. Since 1973, more than 99 people have been released from prison after being sentenced to death despite their innocence, The Social Psychology of Police Interrogation: The

Show More

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *