1 Taunos

Myles Burnyeat Bibliography Example

Studies in Platonic Political Philosophy

by Leo Strauss, with an introduction by Thomas L. Pangle

University of Chicago Press, 260 pp., $8.95 (paper)


“Wishing neither to be destroyed nor to bring destruction among the multitude, the considerate few have imperturbably conveyed to their readers an eloquence of articulate silences and pregnant indications.”1

This extraordinary sentence was written not by Leo Strauss but to introduce a book honoring him. It perfectly expresses the substance, and the style, of his teaching. Accordingly, it does not explain to outsiders what that teaching is, or by what powers the teaching has raised Strauss to his present eminence as a guru of American conservatism. For initiates of his ideas, on the other hand, those who are in touch with “the considerate few,” the sentence will be like poetry in the way it condenses into one pregnant utterance the entire thought-world of the master.

Leo Strauss was born in Germany in 1899 and died in Chicago in 1973. He studied philosophy at several German universities and worked as an assistant at the Academy of Jewish Research in Berlin, where he “concentrated on biblical criticism and the thought of Spinoza.” He came to New York in 1938 and taught political theory at the University of Chicago between 1948 and 1969, when he retired.2 By this time he was arguably one of the most influential thinkers in the US.

There are two ways to approach Strauss’s thinking. Some fourteen books and a multitude of learned papers are listed in the bibliography of Strauss’s writings appended to the volume under review. Alternatively, one may sign up for initiation with a Straussian teacher—at Harvard, at the University of Chicago, or the many other universities and colleges to which Strauss’s pupils and the pupils of his pupils have now penetrated.

It is the second method that produces the sense of belonging and believing. The books and papers are freely available on the side of the Atlantic from which I write, but Strauss has no discernible influence in Britain at all. No one writing in the London Review of Books would worry—as Stephen Toulmin worried recently in these pages about the State Department’s policy-planning staff—that Mrs. Thatcher’s civil servants know more about the ideas of Leo Strauss than about the realities of the day.3 Strauss has no following in the universities where her civil servants are educated. Somehow, the interchange between teacher and pupil gives his ideas a potency that they lack on the printed page.

There is no doubt that Strauss was an inspiring teacher. Lewis Coser’s recent study of refugee scholars in America singles him out: “He alone among eminent refugee intellectuals succeeded in attracting a brilliant galaxy of disciples who created an academic cult around his teaching.”4 And many stories testify that the disciples too are as impressive in their teaching as in their scholarly productions. But for an outsider this only doubles the enigma. How do Strauss’s ideas attract such devotion? And why do they need…

This article is available to online subscribers only.
Please choose from one of the options below to access this article:

Print Premium Subscription — $99.95

Purchase a print premium subscription (20 issues per year) and also receive online access to all content on nybooks.com.

Online Subscription — $69.00

Purchase an Online Edition subscription and receive full access to all articles published by the Review since 1963.

One-Week Access — $4.99

Purchase a trial Online Edition subscription and receive unlimited access for one week to all the content on nybooks.com.

If you already have one of these subscriptions, please be sure you are logged in to your nybooks.com account. If you subscribe to the print edition, you may also need to link your web site account to your print subscription. Click here to link your account services.

  • Karla Jimenez, author of ClassicNote. Completed on August 1, 2014, copyright held by GradeSaver.
  • Updated and revised by Aaron Suduiko January 13, 2015. Copyright held by GradeSaver.
  • Scott Porter Consigny. Gorgias, Sophist and Artist. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 2001.
  • Platonic Studies. Gregory Vlastos. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1981.
  • Johnson, William A. "Dramatic Frame And Philosophic Idea In Plato." American Journal Of Philology 119.4 (1998): 577. Biography Reference Bank (H.W. Wilson). Web. 20 July 2014.

  • Dorter, Kenneth. "The Significance Of The Speeches In Plato's Symposium." Philosophy And Rhetoric 2.(1969): 215-234. Philosopher's Index. Web. 20 July 2014.

  • Dover, Kenneth James. "Aristophanes' Speech In Plato's Symposium." Journal Of Hellenic Studies 86.(1966): 41-50. Art Index Retrospective (H.W. Wilson). Web. 1 Aug. 2014.

  • Craig, Randall. "Plato's Symposium And The Tragicomic Novel." Studies In The Novel 17.(1985): 158. Biography Reference Bank (H.W. Wilson). Web. 23 July 2014.

  • Burnyeat, Myles. "Socratic Midwifery, Platonic Inspiration." Essays On The Philosophy Of Socrates (1992): 53-65. Essay and General Literature Index (H.W. Wilson). Web. 23 July 2014.

  • Edelstein, Ludwig. "The Role of Eryximachus in Plato's Symposium." Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 76. 1945: 85-103. The Johns Hopkins University Press. Web. 20 July 2014.

  • Ventakaram, Prabhu. "An Analysis of Love and Virtue in Plato's Symposium." Eureka College. Web. 20 July 2014.

  • Thomas Brickhouse and Nicholas D. Smith. "Plato." Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2014-07-27. <http://www.iep.utm.edu/plato/>.
  • Jona Lendering. "Greek homosexuality." Livius. 2014-07-27. <http://www.livius.org/ho-hz/homosexuality/homosexuality.html>.
  • Radcliffe G. Edmonds III. "Socrates The Beautiful: Role Reversal and Midwifery in Plato's I[Symposium]." Bryn Mawr College. 2014-07-17. <http://www.brynmawr.edu/classics/redmonds/socrates.html>.
  • Leave a Comment


    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *