Is Our Election Process Fair Argumentative Essay Format
Election is one of the most important events in every country. People vote for their favorite candidate believing that he will represent their interests on the official level. Moreover, election is the integral part of our democratic society, where people can influence political situation of their country. Naturally, it is impossible to generate the ideal system of elections because of great number of factors. No wonder, there are always strong and weak sides in every system. Nowadays, many people ask if our election process is fair. This issue requires detailed and specific analysis.
Election process is very important for the wellbeing of every country. There are countries that do not elect their rulers. Of course, such countries resemble totalitarian societies.
When you cannot take the active part in election, you cannot wait for the improvement of your life. On the other hand, election does not always guarantee good life and prosperity.
Furthermore, election process is not always fair. Politicians are able to cheat common people and steal their votes. When a political party has unlimited power and influence, it is able to use elections for its own profit. It can support its candidates with the help of illegal methods.
Election process in the USA is a very controversial topic. On the one hand, the USA is supposed to be the mother of democracy. Its election process is believed to be transparent and fair. The USA is a country of opportunities. It means that a smart person is able to apply her skills and knowledge to become rich and prosperous. Naturally, only a fair and democratic country can provide its people with such opportunities. Therefore, the USA has the healthiest political system and it can organize election process effectively. People can vote for their favorite politician and he has solid chances to win the elections. A country with unfavorable political environment is not able to organize elections transparently. In such countries, election process is connected with corruption, bribes and violence. Fortunately, one cannot say such things about the US election process.
Of course, it is impossible to claim that elections in the USA are perfect. There are many weak sides that reduce the quality of elections. To begin with, there is a popular vote in election process. A popular vote is a method of selecting a politician among several candidates. People give their votes to their candidate and the candidate who receives the biggest number of votes wins.
This system is the simplest and the most popular in the world. However, our country has the Electoral College. This body is supposed to be more influential than the results of a popular vote.
The Electoral College is a specific body that resembles the US Congress. Every state has the definite number of electors who vote for the definite candidate. The number of electors depends on population of the state. There were many cases when a candidate won in a popular vote but lost the election process because of the influence of the Electoral College.
In this case, we can say that the US election process is unfair. It is not right that a small group of electors support their candidate in spite of the fact that the majority of people support another politician. Of course, these electors are supposed to represent the general opinion of their state, but very often, their point of view is completely different.
Election process in the USA is a delicate matter and it has its advantages and disadvantages. In the majority of cases, people are satisfied with the quality of their electoral system.
If you are looking for professional help with this political science essay – visit this site right now. Highly qualified writers will prepare a great-quality custom written paper for you.
free essay, political science essays
Many people would argue that the American political process is unfair, but they would say that for different reasons. Some people would say that the American political process does not accurately reflect the will of the people and that this is unfair. Other people would argue that it is not feasible for this to be the case and that certain people deserve more influence in American politics because of their greater contribution to society or because they are more qualified for the job. These two sides have been in conflict since the early days of the American political process.
The representative democracy of the United States does render the opinions of individual voters relatively unimportant. While voters and their votes do matter and candidates spend millions of dollars trying to sway the opinions of voters, many individual voters are frustrated with the fact that it barely seems to make a difference whether they vote or not and the voting seems to be a matter of principle.However, the fact that every voter is in the same situation does seem to make the process fair in its own way. People have been arguing since the beginning that American democracy has to be representative.
Pure democracy with no representatives is very rare when the voting public has hundreds of millions of people. It usually only works in much smaller societies. While some people would argue that this does not mean the situation is fair, they might still make a case for the system in a pragmatic sense. Democracy requires an educated middle class to be sustainable, or people will often vote for the very same individuals that democracies seek to eliminate.
You may also like these articles:
In Principle and In Practice
It should be noted that a lot of Americans functionally never vote for reasons beyond their control. Even getting to the polling booths or getting absentee ballots is tough in some areas, which is genuine discrimination against poorer people and people who live in certain regions. Disabled individuals often find it difficult to vote for various reasons, so their voice gets excluded from American politics.
Some wealthy people argue that since they pay most of the taxes, they deserve a bigger voice in American politics. However, wealthy people pay fewer taxes in America than they do in other countries. Also, wealthy people have more control over American elections than almost anyone even though they each have one vote. Wealthy people can give campaign contributions to the candidates of their choice, so the candidates of their choice will have an advantage during the election. Elections are automatically slightly biased in favor of the wealthy on this basis alone.
Wealthy people represent a small portion of the population, and the policies that favor lining their pockets further will directly go against the interests of most of the country. More and more wealth has been directed to the wealthy over the past thirty years, and campaign contributions towards certain candidates have had a huge impact on that.
The situation involving wealthy people buying elections is reflective of faulty laws in the sense that there could be laws limiting campaign contributions. However, this situation does not directly reflect a problem with the baseline American political process or democratic structure itself. If anything, this problem demonstrates that the American political process is not working as it was intended. Wealthy people who have no political experience and who are acting purely in their own self-interest have more political power than many politicians.
The overall system for American voters and the American representative democracy isn't perfectly fair, but having a direct democracy that was perfectly fair would be too difficult. However, the fact that wealthy people are able to subvert the political process and control it so substantially automatically taints the American political process, rendering it unfair even though there are no laws mandating that this should be the case. The disproportionate influence of the wealthy has made the American political process unfair, and not the representative democratic structure.